Build lasting rankings with editorial backlinks that survive core updates and audits

Fewer links, chosen properly, reported honestly.

Link building has a reputation problem, and mostly it earns it. The industry rewards speed, and speed rewards shortcuts. We took the opposite position: a slower pipeline, a smaller monthly ceiling, and a review step that occasionally kills a placement we have already paid for. It costs us margin and it keeps the results defensible.

The working order

  1. Read the site firstBefore any outreach we go through the pages you want to rank, the profile you already have, and the competitors you keep losing to. Sometimes this ends with us recommending you spend the budget on the pages instead.
  2. Agree the shortlistYou see every publisher before we approach them, with the reasoning attached. Anything you are not comfortable with comes off the list and nothing is placed on a site you have not seen.
  3. Write to their standardThe draft has to survive their editor, not ours. If it needs three rounds it gets three rounds — a piece that reads like filler undermines the link sitting inside it.
  4. Re-check on a schedulePlacements are revisited long after they are invoiced. A link that vanishes in month four is our problem to raise, not yours to discover.
  5. Pitch, not blastEach publisher gets an individual approach about a specific idea. This is the slow part and it is the part that decides whether the placement is any good.

How we can help

Content support
If the page you want to build links to is not worth linking to yet, we will say so, and we can help fix it. Building links to a thin page is money spent teaching people the page is thin.
Anchor text planning
Before anything is placed we map what your profile already looks like and where it is lopsided. The plan then fills the gaps rather than piling more of the same anchors on top.
Migration link care
Site moves are where profiles quietly bleed out. We map the old link targets, watch the redirects and chase the publishers whose links broke in the process.
Editorial guest posts
We pitch a genuine article idea to the publisher, write it to their standard, and place your link inside the body where it supports the argument. No author boxes, no sidebar dumping.

About

We started as an in-house team doing this for one portfolio of sites, which is a useful way to learn the trade because you cannot hand the consequences to somebody else at the end of the quarter. When the process worked well enough that people started asking to borrow it, it became a service.

We have been doing this long enough to have made most of the available mistakes at our own expense. The process on this page is largely a list of things we now refuse to repeat.

This began as an internal tool for a small group of site owners who were tired of buying links and then auditing them afterwards. Most of the rules on this page exist because at some point we broke one of them and had to clean up after ourselves.

What lands in your inbox

If a placement did not happen, the report says which one and why. Campaigns that only ever report successes are hiding the interesting part.

You get a spreadsheet and a short written summary. The spreadsheet is the record; the summary is there so that whoever forwards it to a finance director does not have to interpret it themselves.

Alongside new placements, each report lists everything we re-checked from previous cycles and its current state. Links that disappeared appear in the report as clearly as links that went live.

Frequently asked

Where are you based?

The team is distributed across Europe, which is mostly why the outreach in Polish, Ukrainian, German and Spanish is done by people who actually speak those languages.

Who writes the content?

We do, to the publisher's brief. If you would rather supply drafts, we will edit them to the publisher's standard before submission.

How do you price?

By placement, on the publisher, agreed before we start. There is no bulk discount for volume because volume is not what we are selling.

How long before anything shows up in Ahrefs or Semrush?

Placement and indexation are different problems. A link can be live and correct for weeks before a crawler gets to that page, particularly on smaller publishers. We report the live URL on the day it publishes so you are never waiting on a tool to tell you the work happened.

Can we approve publishers before you approach them?

You always do. Nothing is pitched to a site you have not seen and signed off. If you want to be involved in the drafting as well, that is fine too.

Can you fix a profile somebody else built badly?

Often, yes. It usually starts with an audit and an unhappy conversation, and the first phase is subtraction rather than addition.

Do you place links to affiliate or YMYL pages?

Sometimes, and it depends entirely on the page. We will look at it and give you an honest read on whether publishers will take it.

What gets a site rejected

Ways to work together

Scale

  • Capped by our capacity, not your budget
  • Dedicated publisher relationships
  • Digital PR campaigns included
  • White-label reporting
  • Direct line to the person doing the work

Growth

  • Higher monthly ceiling
  • Anchor plan maintained across cycles
  • Multilingual publishers available
  • Quarterly strategy review
  • Priority on reclamation work

Audit

  • Full profile read
  • Competitor gap list
  • Anchor distribution map
  • Written recommendations
  • No placement commitment

Starter

  • Small monthly placement count
  • Publisher shortlist approval
  • Contextual body links
  • Full evidence report
  • Scheduled re-checks

Further reading

If any of the above raised a question this page does not answer, start here:

Start a conversation

If you want to test us, commission the smallest thing on the list. We would rather earn a larger engagement than negotiate for one up front.

hello@znavo.site