Scale
- Capped by our capacity, not your budget
- Dedicated publisher relationships
- Digital PR campaigns included
- White-label reporting
- Direct line to the person doing the work
Fewer links, chosen properly, reported honestly.
Link building has a reputation problem, and mostly it earns it. The industry rewards speed, and speed rewards shortcuts. We took the opposite position: a slower pipeline, a smaller monthly ceiling, and a review step that occasionally kills a placement we have already paid for. It costs us margin and it keeps the results defensible.
We started as an in-house team doing this for one portfolio of sites, which is a useful way to learn the trade because you cannot hand the consequences to somebody else at the end of the quarter. When the process worked well enough that people started asking to borrow it, it became a service.
We have been doing this long enough to have made most of the available mistakes at our own expense. The process on this page is largely a list of things we now refuse to repeat.
This began as an internal tool for a small group of site owners who were tired of buying links and then auditing them afterwards. Most of the rules on this page exist because at some point we broke one of them and had to clean up after ourselves.
If a placement did not happen, the report says which one and why. Campaigns that only ever report successes are hiding the interesting part.
You get a spreadsheet and a short written summary. The spreadsheet is the record; the summary is there so that whoever forwards it to a finance director does not have to interpret it themselves.
Alongside new placements, each report lists everything we re-checked from previous cycles and its current state. Links that disappeared appear in the report as clearly as links that went live.
The team is distributed across Europe, which is mostly why the outreach in Polish, Ukrainian, German and Spanish is done by people who actually speak those languages.
We do, to the publisher's brief. If you would rather supply drafts, we will edit them to the publisher's standard before submission.
By placement, on the publisher, agreed before we start. There is no bulk discount for volume because volume is not what we are selling.
Placement and indexation are different problems. A link can be live and correct for weeks before a crawler gets to that page, particularly on smaller publishers. We report the live URL on the day it publishes so you are never waiting on a tool to tell you the work happened.
You always do. Nothing is pitched to a site you have not seen and signed off. If you want to be involved in the drafting as well, that is fine too.
Often, yes. It usually starts with an audit and an unhappy conversation, and the first phase is subtraction rather than addition.
Sometimes, and it depends entirely on the page. We will look at it and give you an honest read on whether publishers will take it.
If any of the above raised a question this page does not answer, start here:
If you want to test us, commission the smallest thing on the list. We would rather earn a larger engagement than negotiate for one up front.